Part 3: Iterated Functions |
Given any two binary operations a(x,y) and b(x,y), suppose there is a function f such that |
|
For any set of such functions, define the auxiliary functions |
|
It's easy to see that u and v are "conjugates", in the sense that |
|
Slightly less obvious is the fact that the nth compositions of u(x) and v(x), denoted by un(x) and vn(x) respectively, are also conjugates, i.e., |
|
This identity is sometimes useful in simplifying computations. To illustrate, consider the case a(x,y) = xy, b(x,y) = x + y, f(x) = ln(x). Here the auxiliary functions are |
|
Taking an initial x value of 10, the first few iterations of u(x) are |
10.000000, 23.025851, 72.223287, 309.098522 |
Beginning with an initial x value of f(10) = 2.302585 the first few iterations of v(x) are |
2.302585, 3.136617, 4.279762, 5.733660 |
Comparing these sequences of iterates, we see that the function f maps from one to the other. For example, we have f(309.098522) = 5.733660. More generally, if we take f(x) = logb(x) for any base b, and define the auxiliary functions |
|
then the nth iterates of these functions, denoted by un(x) and vn(x), are related by the equation |
|
The logarithm has a unique inverse (although the log itself is multi-valued for negative arguments), so this allows us to give un(x) explicitly in terms of vn(logb(x)) as |
|
In general, any function f(x) possessing an "addition rule" can be adapted to this process. A few examples are summarized below. |
|
|
|
|
This procedure can also be applied to additive number-theoretic functions. For example, |
consider the case |
|
where x(x) is the "sum-of-prime-factors" function. In this case the auxiliary |
functions are |
|
Beginning with an initial value of 10, the first few iterations of H are |
10, 70, 980, 22540, 1036840 |
Beginning with an initial value of x(10) = 7, the first few iterations of G give |
7, 14, 23, 46, 71 |
and we can verify that x(1036840) = 71. |
Proposition 12: Letting Hn(N) and Gn(N) denote the nth iterations of the functions H(N) = Nx(N) and G(N) = N + x(N), we have |
|
and |
|
for any integer m.Proof: It's easy to show by induction that |
|
for any integer a. Now suppose that |
|
Then we have |
|
The quantity in the square brackets equals Gk(x(m)), as can be seen by setting a = x(m) in the earlier expression for Gk(a), so the proof is completed by induction. à |
Corollary 12-1: For any non-negative integers n and m we have |
|
Proof: By Proposition 12 we have |
|
and |
|
Combining these two equations gives |
|
Rearranging terms gives |
|
The right hand side equals zero, so the left side also equals zero for any non-negative integer k. à |