Relative Rain
If someone goes from his car to his front door in a rainstorm, will
he get more wet, less wet, or equally wet if he walks or runs? This
is a very commonly asked question. To develop a quantative answer,
let's first consider a spherical man, and assume he moves to his car
in a straight horizontal path with velocity u. The raindrops are
falling at an angle such that its velocity is v_z in the downward
direction, v_x in the horizontal direction (straight into the man's
face), and v_y in the sideways horizontal direction (the man's left
to right). The intensity of the rain is such that each cubic foot
of air contains G grams of water.
Relative to the rain's frame of reference the raindrops are
stationary and the man and his car both have an upward velocity
v_z and a sideways velocity (right to left) of v_y. In addition,
the man has a forward horizontal velocity of u + v_x.
Clearly the amount of rain encountered by the man is equal to G
times the volume of space he sweeps out as he moves relative to
this stationary mist of raindrops. Since he is spherical with
radius R, this swept volume is essentially equal to pi*R^2*L,
where L is the distance travelled (relative to the rain's frame
of reference).
If D is the horizontal distance to the car, and the man moves
straight to his car with velocity u, the time it takes him is D/u.
His total velocity relative to the falling rain is
________________________________
V_t = / (u + v_x)^2 + (v_y)^2 + (v_x)^2 (1)
so the distance he moves relative to the rain is (D/u)*V_t.
Therefore, the amount of rain he encounters in the general case
for arbitrary direction of rainfall is
_____________________________________
| / v_x\2 /v_y\2 /v_z\2
W = G*D*pi*R^2 | ( 1 + --- ) + ( --- ) + ( --- ) (2)
\| \ u / \ u / \ u /
We can easily incorporate other assumptions, such as the man having
some non-spherical shape. It's just a matter of geometry to compute
how much volume he sweeps out relative to the rain's frame of
reference.
Notice that if v_x = v_y = 0 then the rain is falling vertically
with a total velocity v = v_z. In this case equation (2) reduces
to
____________
| / v \2
W = G*D*pi*R^2 | 1 + ( --- ) (3)
\| \ u /
which shows that the key parameter is the ratio of the rain's
vertical speed to the man's horizontal speed. Of course, if v
was zero (which would mean the rain was motionless relative to
the ground), then L would always equal D, regardless of how fast
the man runs. On the other hand, for any v greater than zero,
the amount of rain he encounters will go down as his horizontal
velocity u increases.
Incidentally, suppose you're waiting for the person in his car, and
you intend to figure out how fast he ran based on how soggy he is
when he reaches the car. You know the distance from the building to
the car is D, and you assume the time he spends in the rain will be
proportional to his wettness when he arrives. Thus, you have W = cT,
where T is his (presumed) travel time, w is his accumulated wettness
upon arrival, and c is a constant. Therefore, you perceive his
velocity to be
v = Dc/W (4)
If the rain is falling vertically with a constant velocity C, then
for an appropriate choice of units we have
_____________
| / C \2
W = | 1 + ( --- ) (5)
\| \ V /
where V is the person's true speed (with time measured according to
his wrist-watch, rather than according to his wettness). Substituting
this into equation (4) gives the relation between the man's "proper
velocity" and his "wettness velocity"
_______________
v/c | / v \2
----- = | 1 - ( --- ) (6)
V/C \| \ c /
This shows that, although the man can reduce his travel time to an
arbitrarily short duration (according to his wrist-watch), you will
never perceive him to have moved with a velocity greater than c.
Needless to say, equation (6) is the Lorentz transformation factor
that plays a central role in the theory of special relativity,
raising the question: Was Einstein all wet?
Return to MathPages Main Menu
Сайт управляется системой
uCoz