A More Immortal Atlas
Does 1 + 1 = 2? It may be useful to recall the thoughts of Socrates
on this subject, as recorded by Plato in Phaedo:
"I will not even allow myself to say that where one is added
to one, either the one to which it is added or the one that is
added becomes two, or that the one added and the one to which
it is added become two because of the addition of the one to
the other. I wonder that, when each of them is separate from
the other, each of them is one, but when they are come near to
one another, this is the cause of their becomming two, the
coming together. Nor can I any longer be persuaded that when
one thing is divided, this division is the cause of its becoming
two, for just now the cause of becoming two was the opposite.
At that time it was their joining, and one was added to the
other, but now it is because they are separated from each other.
I do not any longer persuade myself that I know why a unit or
anything else comes to be, or perishes or exists by the old
method of investigation, and I do not accept it, but I have
a confused method of my own.
One day I heard someone reading, as he said, from a book of
Anaxagoras, and saying that it is Mind that directs and is
the cause of everything. I was delighted with this cause
and it seemed to me good, in a way, that Mind should be the
cause of all. I thought that if this were so, the directing
Mind would direct everything and arrange each thing in the
way that was best. If then one wished to know the cause of
each thing, why it comes to be or perishes or exists, one had
to find what was the best way for it to be, or to be acted
upon, or to act. On these premises then, it befitted a man
to investigate only, about this and other things, what is
best. The same man must inevitably know what is worse, for
that is part of the same knowledge.
As I reflected on this subject I was glad to think that I
had found in Anaxagoras a teacher about the cause of things
after my own heart, and that he would tell me, first, whether
the earth is flat or round, and then explain why it is so of
necessity, saying which is better, and that it was better to
be so. If he said it was in the middle of the universe, he
would go on to show that it was better for it to be in the
middle, and if he showed me those things I should be prepared
never to desire any other kind of cause.
I was ready to find out in the same way about the sun and
the moon and the other heavenly bodies, about their relative
speed, their turnings, and whatever else happened to them,
how it is best that each should act or be acted upon. I
never thought that Anaxagoras, who said that those things
were directed by Mind, would bring in any other cause for
them than that it was best for them to be as they are. Once
he had given the best for each as the cause for each, and
the general cause of all, I thought he would go on to explain
the common good for all, and I would not have exchanged my
hopes for a fortune. I eagerly acquired his books and read
them as quickly as I could in order to know the best and the
worst as soon as possible.
This wonderful hope was dashed as I went on reading, and saw
that the man made no use of Mind, nor gave it any responsibility
for the management of things, but mentioned as causes air and
ether and water and many other strange things... It is what the
majority appear to do, like people groping in the dark; they
call it a cause, thus giving it a name which does not belong
to it. That is why one man surrounds the earth with a vortex
to make the heavens keep it in place, another makes the air
support it like a wide lid. As for their capacity of being
in the best place they could possibly be put, this they do
not look for, nor do they believe it to have any divine force,
but they believe that they will some time discover a stronger
and more immortal Atlas to hold everything together..."
Return to MathPages Main Menu
Сайт управляется системой
uCoz